Evolutionary approach to stackelberg game based demand response for electric vehicle charging

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Jun 30, 2018
Download
PDF
Statistic

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...
Volume 13, Issue 2, June 2017

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Priyanka Shinde
Department of Electrical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Madras Chennai, Tamil Nadu
K. Shanti Swarup
Department of Electrical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Madras Chennai, Tamil Nadu

Abstract

In this era of industrialization and modernization, global warming and climate change are pressing issues. In order to address that transportation electrification seems to be a potential solution owing to much lower carbon and nitrogen oxides emissions as opposed to their Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) vehicles counterparts. But to realize this customers need to be motivated to adopt this new technology. There should be opportunity for customers to exploit the elastic nature of EV load by participating in the electricity market and adjust their consumption levels such that they derive maximum satisfaction with the price at which they buy the electricity. This introduces the concept of Demand response, which aims at reduction of power generation costs and electricity bills by allowing con- trol of electricity consumption through electricity prices. This interaction between retailer and customers leads to a conflict of interest as every entity aims at maximizing their benefits. In this study, a Stackelberg game model has been developed where the retailer sets electricity price with the knowledge of EV customers’ behavior so as to maximize its profit and the EV customers set consumption level to maximize their payoffs. We have proven that game settles down at an equilibrium point where EV charging requirements are met.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Shinde, P., & Shanti Swarup, K. (2018). Evolutionary approach to stackelberg game based demand response for electric vehicle charging. Power Research - A Journal of CPRI, 345–354. Retrieved from https://node6473.myfcloud.com/~geosocin/CPRI/index.php/pr/article/view/124

References

  1. C. for Biological Diversity. Transportation and global warming. [On- line]. Available: http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/programs/ climate- law-institute/transportation-andglobalwarming
  2. E. Sortomme and M. A. El-Sharkawi, “Optimal charging strategies for unidirectional vehicle-to-grid,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 131–138, 2011.
  3. J. A. P. Lopes, F. J. Soares, and P. M. R. Almeida, “Integration of electric vehicles in the electric power system,” Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 99, No. 1, pp. 168–183, 2011.
  4. O. Sundstrom and C. Binding, “Flexible charging optimization for electric vehicles considering distribution grid constraints,” IEEE Trans- actions on Smart Grid, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 26–37, 2012.
  5. N. Rotering and M. Ilic, “Optimal charge control of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles in deregulated electricity markets,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 1021–1029, 2011.
  6. S. S. Raghavan, “Impact of demand response on electric vehicle charging and day ahead market operations,” in 2016 IEEE Power and Energy Conference at Illinois (PECI), pp. 1–7, Feb 2016.
  7. M. C. Falvo, G. Graditi, and P. Siano, “Electric vehicles integration in demand response programs,” in Power Electronics, Electrical Drives, Automation and Motion (SPEEDAM), 2014 International Symposium on, pp. 548–553, June 2014.
  8. B. F. Hobbs and J.-S. Pang, “Nash-cournot equilibria in electric power markets with piecewise linear demand functions and joint constraints,” Operations Research, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 113–127, 2007.
  9. A. H. Mohsenian-Rad, V. W. S. Wong, J. Jatskevich, R. Schober, and A. LeonGarcia, “Autonomous demand-side management based on game-theoretic energy consumption scheduling for the future smart grid,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 320–331, Dec 2010.
  10. P. Yang, G. Tang, and A. Nehorai, “A gametheoretic approach for optimal time-of-use electricity pricing,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 884– 892, 2013.
  11. Z. Ma, D. S. Callaway, and I. A. Hiskens, “Decentralized charging con- trol of large populations of plug-in electric vehicles,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 67–78, Jan 2013.
  12. S. Maharjan, Q. Zhu, Y. Zhang, S. Gjessing, and T. Basar, “Dependable demand response management in the smart grid: A stackelberg game approach,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 120–132, March 2013.
  13. W. Tushar, W. Saad, H. V. Poor, and D. B. Smith, “Economics of electric vehicle charging: A game theoretic approach,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 1767–1778, 2012.
  14. S.-G. Yoon, Y.-J. Choi, S. Bahk, and J.-K. Park, “Stackelberg game based demand response for at-home electric vehicle charging,” 2015.
  15. T. M. News. (2010) Electric vehicles: What you need to know about home charging. [Online]. Avail- able: http://www.mercury news.com/2010/09/02/electric-vehicles -what- you-need-to-know-about-homecharging -2/
  16. T. C. Library. Animated house. [Online]. Available: http://clipart- library.com/ animated-house.html
  17. P. Samadi, A. H. Mohsenian-Rad, R. Schober, V. W. S. Wong, and J. Jatskevich, “Optimal real-time pricing algorithm based on utility max- imization for smart grid,” in 2010 First IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications, Oct 2010, pp. 415–420.
  18. J. Zhang, J. D. Fuller, and S. Elhedhli, “A stochastic programming model for a day-ahead electricity market with realtime reserve shortage pricing,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 703–713, May 2010.
  19. A. J. Wood and B. Wollenberg, “Power generation operation and control—2nd edition,” in Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Vol. 37, No. 3. Elsevier, 1996, p. 195.