Modification in existing two part tariff structure incorporating the effect of locational marginal pricing for Indian utility system

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Sep 20, 2017
Download
PDF
Statistic

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...
Volume 13, Issue 3, September 2017

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Harleen Kaur
M.Tech student, Department of Electrical Engineering, Guru Nanak Dev Engineering College, Ludhiana, 141006
Kanwardeep Singh
Associate Professor, Department of Electrical Engineering, Guru Nanak Dev Engineering College, Ludhiana, 141006

Abstract

This paper proposes an approach for the modification in existing Two Part Tariff (TPT) structure incorporating the effect of Locational Marginal Pricing (LMP). LMP can represent economic signal for instant to instant variation of generation, transmission and load scenarios. Conventionally TPT consists of fixed and operating prices, obtained on annual basis. In this paper, it has been proposed to replace the operating price of TPT by LMP. LMP at various buses which represents the actual price of power delivery, can be obtained from the solution of AC optimal power flow. LMP value at any bus is added to fixed price to obtain the modified TPT structure at that bus. The load payments are obtained by utilizing modified TPT for an Indian utility 62-bus system, and the results are compared with and without considering loading and considering the effect of energy conservation. The simulated results show that huge benefit is obtained by modified TPT structure as compared to existing TPT structure in case when line loading and energy conservation are considered. Moreover with modified TPT structure costumers will be able to respond more accurately according to the prevailing electricity market scenarios.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Kaur, H., & Singh, K. (2017). Modification in existing two part tariff structure incorporating the effect of locational marginal pricing for Indian utility system. Power Research - A Journal of CPRI, 455–462. Retrieved from https://node6473.myfcloud.com/~geosocin/CPRI/index.php/pr/article/view/99

References

  1. PSPCL: Introduction of two-part tariff, h t t p : //p s p c l.i n/file/2017/05/arr_petition_2013_14_two_tariff.pdf. Last accessed on Oct 06, 2017.
  2. J Hao, Y Gu, Y Zhang and J J Zhang, Locational Marginal Pricing in the Campus Power System at the Power Distribution Level, IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, pp.1-5, 2016.
  3. F Rahimi and A Ipakchi, Demand Response as a Market Resource under the Smart Grid Paradigm, IEEE Trans on Smart Grids, Vol. 1, pp. 82-88, 2010.
  4. A Soroudi, P Siano and A Keane, Optimal DR and ESS Scheduling for Distribution Losses Payments Minimization under Electricity Price Uncertainty, IEEE Trans. on Smart Grid, Vol. 7, pp. 261-272, 2016.
  5. T Logenthiran, D Srinivasan and T Z Shun, Demand Side Management in Smart Grid Using Heuristic Optimization, IEEE Trans. on Smart Grid, Vol. 3, pp. 1244-1252, 2012.
  6. A R Khan, A Mahmood, A Safdar, Z A Khan and N A Khan, Load Forecasting, Dynamic Pricing and DSM in Smart Grid: A Review, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 54, pp.1311–1322, 2016.
  7. K Singh, N P Padhy and J D Sharma, Influence of Price Responsive Demand Shifting Bidding on Congestion and LMP in Pool-Based Day-Ahead Electricity Markets,” IEEE Trans on Power System, Vol. 26, pp. 886–896, 2011.
  8. C L Su and D Kirschen, Quantifying the Effect of Demand Response on Electricity Markets, IEEE Trans on Power System, Vol. 24, pp. 1199-1207, Aug. 2009.
  9. M C Caramanis, R E Bohn and F C Schweppe, Optimal Spot Pricing: Practice and Theory, IEEE Trans. Power Apparatus Syst., Vol. PAS-101, pp. 3234–3245, Sept 1982.
  10. R D Christie, B F Wollenberg and I Wangensteen, Transmission Management in the Deregulated Environment, Proc. IEEE, Vol. 88, pp. 170–195, Feb 2000.
  11. N Acharya and N Mithulananthan, Locating Series FACTS devices for Congestion Management in Deregulated Electricity Markets, Elect. Power Syst. Res., Vol. 77, pp. 352–360, 2007.
  12. L Blank and D Gegax, An Enhanced TwoPart Tariff Methodology when Demand Charges are Not Used, The Electricity Journal, Vol. 29, pp. 42-47, 2016.
  13. L Wu, Impact of Price Based Demand Response on Market Clearing and Locational Marginal Prices, IET GTD, Vol. 7, pp.1087-1095, 2013.
  14. G B Shrestha and P A J Fonseka, CongestionDriven Transmission Expansion in Competitive Power Markets, IEEE Trans. Power System, Vol. 19, pp. 1658-1665, 2004.
  15. R D Zimmerman, C E Murillo-Sanchez, and R J Thomas, Matpower: Steady- State Operations, Planning and Analysis Tools for Power Systems Research and Education, IEEE Trans. Power Systems, Vol. 26, pp. 12-19, 2011.
  16. Tariff Determination Methodology for Thermal Power Plant, http://www.npti.in/Download/Distribution/Tariff%20 Determination%20-%20Write%20up.pdf, Last accessed on Oct. 20, 2017
  17. R Gnanadass, N P Padhy and K Manivannan, Assessment of Available Transfer Capability for Practical Power Systems with Combined Economic Emission Dispatch, Int. J. on Electric Power Syst. Res., Vol. 69, pp. 267-276, 2004, https://www.researchgate.net/file.PostFileLoader.html?id=5825f310ed99e1b0707b8be2&assetKey=AS%3A427276501295104%401478882064060, Last accessed on Oct. 20, 2017
  18. K V S Baba, Lecture on Grid Integration of Renewables, National Load Dispatch Center India, 2014, www.iitk.ac.in Last accessed on Oct. 20, 2017.