Application of shuffled bat algorithm for optimal sizing and location of thyristor controlled series compensator

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Sep 20, 2017
Download
PDF
Statistic

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...
Volume 13, Issue 3, September 2017

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

D. Venugopal
Department of EEE, Kamala Institute of Technology & Science, Singapur, Karimnagar
A. Jaya Laxmi
Department of EEE, JNTUH College of Engineering, Hyderabad

Abstract

This paper presents an algorithm for optimal placement and size of the series FACTS device considering branch loading, voltage profile improvement and loss minimization as multi objectives. FACTS device studies and for every combination indices branch loading, voltage profiles are studied. To optimize the objective function new optimization technique called shuffled bat algorithm is proposed. The work is tested on IEEE-30 bus system with different % of loading such as 90,100 and 110% of base load condition. With shuffled bat algorithm, the voltage profile of the system and branch loading with different loading conditions are presented. The performance of the proposed algorithm is compared with conventional sensitivity based optimization method and presented for illustration purpose.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Venugopal, D., & Jaya Laxmi, A. (2017). Application of shuffled bat algorithm for optimal sizing and location of thyristor controlled series compensator. Power Research - A Journal of CPRI, 433–446. Retrieved from https://node6473.myfcloud.com/~geosocin/CPRI/index.php/pr/article/view/97

References

  1. T.J.E.MILLER, “Reactive Power Control in Electric Systems”, New York: Wiley, 1982.
  2. Y. Dai and Y. X. Ni et al., “A study of reactive power marginal price in electricity market”, Electric Power System Research, Vol. 57, pp. 41–48, 2001.
  3. “Study of system operating impacts of FACTS technologies”, GE, ECC Inc., Carson Taylor Seminars, Final Report on EPRI RP 3022-25, Oct.1993.
  4. FACTS Application Task Force, FACTS Applications: IEEE Power Engineering Society, pp.11-49, 1996.
  5. S. Gerbex, R. Cherkaoui, and A. J. Germond, "Optimal location of multi type FACTS devices in a power system by means of genetic algorithms" , IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 16, August, pp. 537-544, 2001.
  6. H.Ambriz-Perez, E.Acha and C.R. FuerteEsquivel, “Advanced SVC models for Newton-Raphson Load Flow and Newton Optimal Power Flow Studies”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol.15, No.1, February 2000.
  7. Sang-Hwan Song, Jung -k-Lim, “Installation and operation of FACTS devices for enhancing steady-state security”, Electric Power Systems Research, 2004.
  8. H.Ambriz-perez, E.Acha and C.R. FuerteEsquivel, “Advanced SVC models for Newton– Raphson load flow and Newton Optimal Power flow studies”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol.15, No.1, pp 129-136, Feb.2000.
  9. J.H.Tovar-Hernandez, C.R. Fuerte-Esquivel and V.M. Chavez-ornelas, “Modelling of Static VAR compensators in Fast Decoupled Load flow”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol.20, No.1, pp.512-514, Feb 2005.
  10. Yorino.n,El-araby,EEsasaki,H&Harada, “A new formulation for FACTS allocation for security enhancement against voltage collapse”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 18, No.1, pp.3-10, September 2003.
  11. Bekri, OL, Fellah, “Optimal location of SVC and TCSC for voltage stability enhancement”, The 4th International Power Engineering and Optimization Conference, pp.7-12, 2010.
  12. LiG, Lie, Shrestha, G, Lo, “Design and application of coordinated multiple FACTS controllers”, IEE Proceedings on Generation, Transmission and Distribution, Vol.147, No.2, pp.112-120, 2000.
  13. Hadi Besharat, Seyed Abbas Taher, “Congestion Management by determining optimal location of TCSC in deregulated power systems”, Electrical Power & Energy Systems, Vol.30, pp 563-568, 2008.
  14. S.N. Singh, A.K. David, “Optimal location of FACTS devices for congestion management”, International Journal of Electric Power Systems, Res. 58, pp. 71–79, 2001.
  15. Eusuff M, Lansey K, Pasha F., “Shuffled frog-leap algorithm: a memetic meta heuristic for discrete optimization.”, Engineering optimization. 38(2):1238(2): pp.129-154.
  16. Kennedy J, Eberhart R,“ Particle Swarm Optimization”, In Proceedings of the International Conference on Neural Networks, pp.1942-1948, 1995.
  17. D uan QY, Gupta VK, Sorooshian S, “Shuffled complex evolution approach for effective and efficient global minimization”, Journal of Optimization Theory Applications 76:pp. 502-521, 1993.
  18. Eusuff M, Lansey KE, “Optimizing of water distribution network design using the shuffled frog leap algorithm.”, Journal of water resource planning management Vol. 129, No.3, Pp. 210-225, 2003.
  19. El-Zonkoly, A.M, “Optimal placement of multidistributed generation units including different load models using particle swarm optimization”, IET Gener. Transm. Distrb5(7),760-771,2011.
  20. Yang.X.S, “Bat algorithm for multi objective optimization.”, Int.J.Bio-Inspired .Computing”, Vol.3, No.5, Pp. 267-274, 2011.
  21. http://www.ee.washington.edu/research/pstca/.