Evaluation of Corrosion Properties of Cenosphere Aluminium Composites

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

T. Prashanth
K. Narasimha Murthy
C. K. Umesh

Abstract

Industrial processes generate certain solid by-products, the disposal of which is of serious environmental concern. The solid by-products are mainly fly ash from the power generation industry, metallurgical ore residues and slag, slurry from the mining industry, etc. Among these, fly-ash utilization continues to be an important area of national concern due to India’s dependence on thermal power generation for its energy supply. Particle reinforced Al matrix composites are emerging out as potential materials to replace conventional alloys/metals. These metal matrix composites (MMCs) find extensive applications in many engineering activities because of their lightweight, high stiffness and high specific strength. This paper discusses the manufacture of cenosphere-aluminium composites. Based on varied ratios of the reinforcement phase, fly-ash cenospheres – 6061 aluminium composite with better features in terms of strength, corrosion resistance and hardness and has been developed. The current work also brings out the structure – property correlation of cenosphere-aluminium metal matrix composite. It is found from the microstructure studies that there is a homogeneous distribution of the cenospheres in the matrix of Al 6061. The corrosion studies show that there is an increase in the corrosion pitting of the cenosphere-aluminium composite.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Prashanth, T., Narasimha Murthy, K., & Umesh, C. K. (2013). Evaluation of Corrosion Properties of Cenosphere Aluminium Composites. Power Research - A Journal of CPRI, 299–304. Retrieved from https://node6473.myfcloud.com/~geosocin/CPRI/index.php/pr/article/view/900

References

  1. Deve H E and McCullough C. “Continuousfiber reinforced Al composites: a new generation”, JOM, Vol. 47, pp. 33–37, 1995.
  2. Vikulin V V, Kelina I Y, Shatalin A S and Rusanova L N. “Advanced ceramic structural materials”, Refract. Ind. Ceram., Vol. 45, pp. 383–386, 2004.
  3. Asthana R, Singh M and Sobczak N. “The role of wetting and reactivity in infiltration of ceramic–metal composites”, Ceram. Eng. Sci. Proc., Vol. 26, pp. 249–261, 2005.
  4. Vassel A. “Continuous fiber reinforced titanium and aluminium composites: a comparison”, Mater. Sci. Eng., Vol. 263, pp. 305–313, 1999.
  5. Rajan T P D, Pillai R M, Pai B C. “Reinforcement coatings and interfaces in aluminium metal matrix composites”, J. Mater. Sci., Vol. 33, pp. 3491–3503, 1998.
  6. Rodel J, Prielipp H, Knechtel M, Claussen N. “Better ceramics through metal modification”, Trans. Mater. Res. Soc., Japan, Vol. 19B, pp. 763–776, 1994.
  7. Schiroky G H, Fareed A S, Sonuparlak B, Lee C T and Sorenson B W. “Fabrication and properties of fiber-reinforced ceramic composites made by directed metal oxidation”, In: S.R. Levine (Ed.), FlightVehicle Materials, Structures, and Dynamics, Vol. 3, ASME, pp. 151–163, 1992.
  8. Biennas J and Walkzag M. “Microstructure and corrosion behavior of aluminium fly ash composites”, Journal of optoelectronics and advanced materials, Vol. 5, No. 2, June 2003.
  9. Veeresh K, Selvaraj and Bhagyashekar. “Studies on physical and tribological properties of Al6061 SiC composites”, Team Tech 2009, Com 16.
  10. Anand Murthy H C, et al, “Influence of chlorides, nitrate and sulphate media on Corrosion behaviour of TiO2 particulate Reinforced Al 6061 Composites”, Portugaliae Electrochimica Acta 2010, Vol. 28, No. 5, pp. 309—320, 2010.
  11. Ramesh C S and Seshadri S K. “Tribological characteristics of Nickel composite coatings”, Wear, Vol. 225, pp. 893–902, 2003.